Thank you for this post. When I started reading it, and saw who was deposing Plotkin, I immediately knew it was going to be good! Aaron Siri is a name I shared with my young attorney son-in-law when he said he doesn’t like to tell people what he does because so many people dislike attorneys. I said I knew of a couple that I thought were heroes and mentioned RFK Jr and Aaron Siri. I also appreciate everything you do. I know you are one of the most thoughtful researchers and truly are looking for the answer. I also cried when I read “Underestimated, An Autism Miracle” because your devotion to your son is so pure.
Might wanna re-think your decision when it comes to RFK Jr. Time will tell w Siri, but at the moment he SEEMS to be the real deal in this war of psyops
I've listened to it more than once over the years. It's such an important document. Respect must be given to the late Toni Bark MD. I recall Aaron Siri in an interview, mentioning how Toni was the one who rang him & pushed him to really go after Plotkin. She realised what a monumental opportunity it was. He really did an amazing job. I've always wondered what Aaron had in stall for day 2 of the deposition. The last section questioning Plotkin's involvement in the Congo felt like it was leading up to something.
I noticed that whenever there is a "measles outbreak," public health, politicians, and the media love to focus on and blame unvaccinated religious groups.
The godfather of vaccines explains why the idea of "cocooning" babies by pushing all adults around them to get vaccinated for pertussis in order to protect the babies actually puts babies in greater danger of contracting pertussis.
DR. PLOTKIN: It appears that the acellular vaccines don’t protect the individual from carrying the organism as much as the so-called whole-cell pertussis vaccines did. . . . But there is a concern that the acellular vaccines may not protect an individual from passing the organism to another individual even if the vaccinated person doesn’t get sick himself or herself.
I'm good with tiny segments of a virus in a vaccine and that makes sense, the thing that makes me cringe is reading how many hyper-toxins are in vaccines, things that can't be necessary to effect a safe immune response.
Maybe I am wrong, but after seeing the last few decades of vaccine "progress" I'll take my chances without.
Plotkin had the hubris and condescension to come in cold.
He was a sitting duck for the disarmingly polite and soft spoken Aaron Siri.
Siri: "Here Dr. Plotkin, I'm going to hand you a little loop of rope. Do you know what this item is commonly used for? Oh? A noose? And how is it applied to a person? Would you mind just demonstrating that for me? I don't want to misunderstand. Oh. I see. And the other end? Can you show me what is usually done with that? That beam is too high to reach? I see. Perhaps if you stood on the table you could just sort of toss it over. Yes. Like that. Now, I'm a little bit unclear on what would be done next...
Plotkin: "Oh here! Are you so dense you can't see the obvious!?" Plotkin steps off the table and the noose draws tight around his neck under his weight.
Siri: "Thank you Dr. Plotkin. I think that will be all".
Plotkin really did come to the deposition utterly unprepared. I’m not sure but it seems like his opinion of his status in the vaccine sphere would be enough to convince anyone of his point of view.
But Aaron Siri is brilliant and hard working. He came in with a strategy and in a soft spoken, almost innocent demeanor constructed trap after trap that Dr. Plotkin obligingly fell into time after time.
He was so badly outmatched in the deposition that he withdrew as an expert witness the next day.
The noose bit was a fiction modeled after the way Siri metaphorically got him to hang himself from a rope of his own making.
"Mr. Siri understood every trick, exaggeration, misstatement, and controversy, and he walked Dr. Plotkin into bear trap after bear trap"
I've seen part of the deposition and even though I'd only intended to watch certain parts of it, I was drawn in--for exactly this reason! I've dealt with attorneys a fair amount and it's true, Mr. Siri is top-notch, exactly what one wants in an attorney and I think doesn't always get. He really didn't miss a trick, and at least in the parts I watched, even when he let something go it seemed it was only to come back to it in a different way later on, having figured out what Plotkin's evasion was and countering it. His mind must be like one of the government's file caverns...
This is wild: around 2h 30/31 or so minutes, Plotkin's definition or descrption answering "what is a virus" basically I think describes the COVID mRNA "vaccines". I mean, it seems to me that by his description or definition, which talks about how a virus operates and what it consists of, the "vaccine" is a virus.
Vaccine industry marketers have a unique ability to rationalize away any implication that there might be a profit motive behind their behavior. Dr. Offit in particular bemoans any hint that his motivations aren’t pure:
But the part that hurts the most is the continued claim that we did this for the money. I don’t know any scientist who does it for the money (you certainly don’t make much in salary). You do it because it’s fun and because you think you can contribute. And the reward for creating a vaccine was also never financial.
Dr. Offit is discussing the six million dollars that he claims he received (other public estimates have been far higher) when a patent for the rotavirus vaccine for which he was a coinventor was sold to Merck. Unlike Dr. Offit, there are many people concerned that financial conflicts heavily impact vaccine policy making, so much so that the US Congress’s Committee on Government Reform issued a blistering report on the very topic, entitled “Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy Making.” The conclusion was a stern rebuke:
The Committee’s investigation has determined that conflict of interest rules employed by the FDA and the CDC have been weak, enforcement has been lax, and committee members with substantial ties to pharmaceutical companies have been given waivers to participate in committee proceedings.
Interestingly, the report was particularly critical of a doctor who served on a decision-making committee affiliated with CDC: Dr. Paul Offit. When a predecessor rotavirus vaccine was added to the recommended vaccine schedule in the United States, Dr. Offit voted in favor of adding it (while his own vaccine was still under development), but when that same vaccine was shown to be causing a high rate of a deadly bowel affliction, Dr. Offit abstained from supporting the vaccine’s removal from the market (it was later removed). In an excellent investigation titled “Voting Himself Rich,” the late, great Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill criticized Dr. Offit’s “use of his former position on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine—to effectively vote himself rich.”
Thank you for this post. When I started reading it, and saw who was deposing Plotkin, I immediately knew it was going to be good! Aaron Siri is a name I shared with my young attorney son-in-law when he said he doesn’t like to tell people what he does because so many people dislike attorneys. I said I knew of a couple that I thought were heroes and mentioned RFK Jr and Aaron Siri. I also appreciate everything you do. I know you are one of the most thoughtful researchers and truly are looking for the answer. I also cried when I read “Underestimated, An Autism Miracle” because your devotion to your son is so pure.
Might wanna re-think your decision when it comes to RFK Jr. Time will tell w Siri, but at the moment he SEEMS to be the real deal in this war of psyops
I actually listened to the Polkn deposition and it’s actually 9 hours long. I had to do it in chunks. Nine hours in one sitting was a bit much.
I've listened to it more than once over the years. It's such an important document. Respect must be given to the late Toni Bark MD. I recall Aaron Siri in an interview, mentioning how Toni was the one who rang him & pushed him to really go after Plotkin. She realised what a monumental opportunity it was. He really did an amazing job. I've always wondered what Aaron had in stall for day 2 of the deposition. The last section questioning Plotkin's involvement in the Congo felt like it was leading up to something.
Re: religious exemptions
I noticed that whenever there is a "measles outbreak," public health, politicians, and the media love to focus on and blame unvaccinated religious groups.
I am literally speechless with rage.
You are a hero! Thank you for all the goodness, truth and light that you shine on pure evil. Many 🙌. The Refusers Xx
Makes sense that Plotkin is an atheist.
He and Fauci are both Godless. Fauci used orphaned boys to experiment on with AZT.
The godfather of vaccines explains why the idea of "cocooning" babies by pushing all adults around them to get vaccinated for pertussis in order to protect the babies actually puts babies in greater danger of contracting pertussis.
DR. PLOTKIN: It appears that the acellular vaccines don’t protect the individual from carrying the organism as much as the so-called whole-cell pertussis vaccines did. . . . But there is a concern that the acellular vaccines may not protect an individual from passing the organism to another individual even if the vaccinated person doesn’t get sick himself or herself.
I'm good with tiny segments of a virus in a vaccine and that makes sense, the thing that makes me cringe is reading how many hyper-toxins are in vaccines, things that can't be necessary to effect a safe immune response.
Maybe I am wrong, but after seeing the last few decades of vaccine "progress" I'll take my chances without.
Ha! I had no idea Plotkin recused himself after the deposition.
Plotkin had the hubris and condescension to come in cold.
He was a sitting duck for the disarmingly polite and soft spoken Aaron Siri.
Siri: "Here Dr. Plotkin, I'm going to hand you a little loop of rope. Do you know what this item is commonly used for? Oh? A noose? And how is it applied to a person? Would you mind just demonstrating that for me? I don't want to misunderstand. Oh. I see. And the other end? Can you show me what is usually done with that? That beam is too high to reach? I see. Perhaps if you stood on the table you could just sort of toss it over. Yes. Like that. Now, I'm a little bit unclear on what would be done next...
Plotkin: "Oh here! Are you so dense you can't see the obvious!?" Plotkin steps off the table and the noose draws tight around his neck under his weight.
Siri: "Thank you Dr. Plotkin. I think that will be all".
Did that really happen?
In a manner of speaking.
Plotkin really did come to the deposition utterly unprepared. I’m not sure but it seems like his opinion of his status in the vaccine sphere would be enough to convince anyone of his point of view.
But Aaron Siri is brilliant and hard working. He came in with a strategy and in a soft spoken, almost innocent demeanor constructed trap after trap that Dr. Plotkin obligingly fell into time after time.
He was so badly outmatched in the deposition that he withdrew as an expert witness the next day.
The noose bit was a fiction modeled after the way Siri metaphorically got him to hang himself from a rope of his own making.
I was thinking that every source you mentioned in your book How to End the Autusm Epidemic would be helpful in this endeavor.
he’s actually extremely religious.. a vax theocrat. his creed only allowed. he’s God..no exemptions. these people are mad…
"Mr. Siri understood every trick, exaggeration, misstatement, and controversy, and he walked Dr. Plotkin into bear trap after bear trap"
I've seen part of the deposition and even though I'd only intended to watch certain parts of it, I was drawn in--for exactly this reason! I've dealt with attorneys a fair amount and it's true, Mr. Siri is top-notch, exactly what one wants in an attorney and I think doesn't always get. He really didn't miss a trick, and at least in the parts I watched, even when he let something go it seemed it was only to come back to it in a different way later on, having figured out what Plotkin's evasion was and countering it. His mind must be like one of the government's file caverns...
In fact I think I want to go watch more of it now. Everyone should! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFTsd042M3o
This is wild: around 2h 30/31 or so minutes, Plotkin's definition or descrption answering "what is a virus" basically I think describes the COVID mRNA "vaccines". I mean, it seems to me that by his description or definition, which talks about how a virus operates and what it consists of, the "vaccine" is a virus.
Vaccine industry marketers have a unique ability to rationalize away any implication that there might be a profit motive behind their behavior. Dr. Offit in particular bemoans any hint that his motivations aren’t pure:
But the part that hurts the most is the continued claim that we did this for the money. I don’t know any scientist who does it for the money (you certainly don’t make much in salary). You do it because it’s fun and because you think you can contribute. And the reward for creating a vaccine was also never financial.
Dr. Offit is discussing the six million dollars that he claims he received (other public estimates have been far higher) when a patent for the rotavirus vaccine for which he was a coinventor was sold to Merck. Unlike Dr. Offit, there are many people concerned that financial conflicts heavily impact vaccine policy making, so much so that the US Congress’s Committee on Government Reform issued a blistering report on the very topic, entitled “Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Policy Making.” The conclusion was a stern rebuke:
The Committee’s investigation has determined that conflict of interest rules employed by the FDA and the CDC have been weak, enforcement has been lax, and committee members with substantial ties to pharmaceutical companies have been given waivers to participate in committee proceedings.
Interestingly, the report was particularly critical of a doctor who served on a decision-making committee affiliated with CDC: Dr. Paul Offit. When a predecessor rotavirus vaccine was added to the recommended vaccine schedule in the United States, Dr. Offit voted in favor of adding it (while his own vaccine was still under development), but when that same vaccine was shown to be causing a high rate of a deadly bowel affliction, Dr. Offit abstained from supporting the vaccine’s removal from the market (it was later removed). In an excellent investigation titled “Voting Himself Rich,” the late, great Dan Olmsted and Mark Blaxill criticized Dr. Offit’s “use of his former position on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to help create the market for rotavirus vaccine—to effectively vote himself rich.”
I am just filled with gratitude that you, Siri, and so so many make it clear that none of us parents will be completely forsaken.
The book Pharma by Gerald Posner was a great eye opener on the greed and malfeasance of the Pharmaceutical industry.
What a weasel!!!